Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court clarifies exemption rules for construction equipment supplied to project contractors

        Schwing Stetter (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise &Service Tax, Chennai

        Schwing Stetter (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise &Service Tax, Chennai - 2014 (299) E.L.T. 94 (Tri. - Chennai) Issues:
        1. Interpretation of exemption notification for goods supplied to projects financed by specified organizations.
        2. Impact of Explanation 2 added to Notification 108/95-CE.
        3. Allegations of goods not cleared to project authority and potential withdrawal from projects.
        4. Adjudication order confirming duty demand, interest, and penalty.
        5. Appeal to Tribunal challenging Commissioner (Appeals) decision.
        6. Pre-deposit waiver and stay petition for admission of appeal.

        Issue 1 - Interpretation of Exemption Notification:
        The judgment revolves around the interpretation of a notification providing exemption from excise duty for goods supplied to projects financed by specified organizations. The appellant, a manufacturer of construction equipment, claimed exemption under this notification by supplying goods to contractors executing projects. The Revenue contended that goods should be cleared only to the project authority, not contractors. The appellant argued that the notification did not specify clearance to the project authority and cited a decision by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in favor of the assessee. The Hon'ble Madras High Court recently upheld this decision, supporting the appellant's position.

        Issue 2 - Impact of Explanation 2:
        The Revenue relied on Explanation 2 added to the notification, stating that goods not withdrawn from the project by the supplier or contractor are eligible for exemption. The Revenue alleged that the impugned goods may eventually be cleared out of the project, making them ineligible for exemption. The Tribunal noted that the demand should be based on specific findings of goods being removed outside the project, not on a mere probability. The Tribunal opined that the exemption does not distinguish between goods integral to the project and those that are not. The effect of Explanation 2 would be examined during the final hearing, leading the Tribunal to admit the appeal without pre-deposit and stay the collection of dues.

        Issue 3 - Allegations and Adjudication:
        The Revenue issued show cause notices alleging that goods were not cleared to the project authority and might have been withdrawn from projects. Three show cause notices demanded duty on goods cleared during a specific period. The combined order confirmed a demand against the appellant, leading to an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) and subsequently to the Tribunal. The appellant argued against the allegations, highlighting ongoing projects and the nature of equipment used, emphasizing that removal post-project completion is natural.

        Issue 4 - Adjudication Order and Appeal:
        The combined order adjudicated the show cause notices, confirming a demand along with interest and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, prompting the appellant to file an appeal with the Tribunal. The appellant sought a waiver and stay of dues for the admission of the appeal, which was granted by the Tribunal.

        This detailed analysis of the judgment showcases the complexities involved in interpreting exemption notifications, the impact of subsequent explanations, addressing specific allegations, the adjudication process, and the subsequent appeal to higher authorities with requests for pre-deposit waiver and stay of dues.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found