Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim for Special Additional Duty was barred by limitation under Notification No. 6/2008, where the bank had wrongly stamped the TR-6 challans with dates later than the actual dates of duty payment.
Analysis: The actual dates of payment of duty were found to be 10.12.2007 and 04.12.2007, and there was no dispute on that aspect. The refund claim was filed on 12.12.2008, beyond one year from the actual dates of payment. The prescribed period under Notification No. 6/2008 had to be computed from the date of actual payment of duty, and the bank's erroneous stamp on the challans could not alter the statutory relevant date.
Conclusion: The refund claim was time-barred and the rejection of refund was and upheld, against the assessee.