1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rules incentive bonus as part of salary, denying deduction claim under Income-tax Act.</h1> The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition regarding the deduction of expenses incurred in earning an incentive bonus, ruling that the bonus ... Salary Issues involved: Interpretation of the term 'salary' under section 17 of the Income-tax Act in relation to incentive bonus received by an employee.Summary:The petitioner, a development officer at the Life Insurance Corporation of India, received an incentive bonus of Rs. 9,536 during the relevant assessment year. He claimed a deduction of Rs. 4,768 as expenses incurred in earning the bonus. However, the Income-tax Officer, appellate authority, and Commissioner rejected the deduction, considering the bonus as part of the petitioner's salary for which standard deduction was allowed.The petitioner argued that the incentive bonus should be treated as income from profession, allowing for the deduction of related expenses. Despite relying on a decision of the Income tax Appellate Tribunal, the authorities maintained that the bonus is indeed part of the salary, citing the broad definition of 'salary' under section 17 of the Income-tax Act. The court referenced previous cases and the Payment of Wages Act, indicating that bonus is encompassed within the definition of wages.Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner received the incentive bonus while in employment, aligning with the definition of 'salary' under the Income-tax Act. The petitioner's contention was deemed without merit, leading to the rejection of the claim for deduction. No costs were awarded in this judgment.