Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of disallowance under section 40(a)(v) / section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the expenditure incurred on maintenance of bungalows occupied by employees for their own benefit and the depreciation allowance on such buildings could be taken into account.
Analysis: The question turned on whether the cost of maintaining employee-occupied buildings and the depreciation attributable to those buildings formed part of the expenditure liable to be disallowed within the statutory ceiling. The Court followed the earlier Full Bench view and subsequent decisions, holding that such expenditure and depreciation in respect of buildings used by employees for their own purposes were properly includible for computing the disallowance under section 40A(5).
Conclusion: The reference was answered in the affirmative. The disallowance was held to be correctly made, and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure on employee-occupied buildings and the related depreciation allowance are includible while computing the statutory disallowance under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.