Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Reversal of Cenvat Credit for SEZ Supply Deemed Duty Payment, Rebate Claim Admissible</h1> <h3>IN RE : DIVI’s LABORATORIES LTD.</h3> IN RE : DIVI’s LABORATORIES LTD. - 2012 (285) E.L.T. 469 (G.O.I.) Issues Involved:1. Rebate claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.2. Whether the reversal of Cenvat Credit under Rule 3(4) and Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 constitutes payment of duty.3. Eligibility of rebate for supplies made to SEZ under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Rebate Claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002:The applicants, manufacturers of Bulk Drugs and Drug intermediates, filed rebate claims for amounts paid on clearance of inputs to SEZ. The Deputy Commissioner initially granted these rebates, but the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-III, reviewed and appealed against these orders, arguing that the claims were contrary to statutory provisions. Specifically, the Commissioner (Appeals) contended that the goods were not cleared directly from the factory of manufacture, as required under Notification No. 40/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001, and thus did not qualify for rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.2. Whether the Reversal of Cenvat Credit under Rule 3(4) and Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Constitutes Payment of Duty:The Commissioner (Appeals) argued that the reversal of Cenvat Credit does not equate to payment of duty, thus disqualifying the rebate claim. However, the applicants countered this by citing Rule 4 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, which mandates that duty must be paid on excisable goods cleared from the factory or warehouse. They further referenced an explanation inserted by Notification No. 8/2007-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2007, which clarifies that duty paid using Cenvat credit is to be treated as 'duty of excise.' The applicants also cited Circular No. 283/117/96-CX, dated 31-12-1996, which supports the interpretation that reversing Cenvat credit amounts to payment of duty.3. Eligibility of Rebate for Supplies Made to SEZ under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002:The applicants argued that supplies to SEZ should be treated as exports, supported by Circular No. 6/2010-Cus., dated 19-3-2010, which states that rebate under Rule 18 is admissible for supplies made from DTA to SEZ. The Government reviewed the case records and observed that the applicants had supplied inputs to SEZ by debiting the Cenvat Credit account. The dispute centered on whether this debit under Rule 3(5) constituted payment of duty. The Government noted that the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, in the case of CCE, Raigarh v. Micro Ink Ltd., had upheld that reversing Cenvat credit under Rule 3(4)/3(5) is equivalent to payment of duty for the purpose of Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.Conclusion:The Government concluded that the reversal of Cenvat Credit under Rules 3(4) and 3(5) is indeed payment of duty for goods supplied to SEZ. This interpretation aligns with the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay's decision and Circular No. 6/2010-Cus. Consequently, the rebate claim under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, is admissible. The impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside, and the original orders granting the rebate were restored. The revision applications succeeded accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found