Tribunal jurisdiction limits prevent transfer of a non-maintainable customs appeal; papers must go to the proper forum.

Where an appeal fell outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Customs Act because it related to drawback matters, the Tribunal could not use its powers under Section 129B or Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules to transfer the matter to the revisional authority. Ancillary procedural powers operate only where the Tribunal is already competent to entertain the appeal; they cannot create jurisdiction. The proper course was to reject the appeal as not maintainable or return the papers for presentation before the correct forum. The impugned transfer order was therefore set aside and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal could transfer an appeal to the revisional authority after finding that the appeal was not maintainable before it.

Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 barred the Tribunal from entertaining the appeal in respect of orders relating to drawback. Once the appeal was found to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction, the powers under Section 129B to confirm, modify, annul, or remand an appeal could not be exercised. Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 only confers ancillary powers in relation to proceedings competently before the Tribunal and cannot be used to assume jurisdiction where none exists. The proper course in such a case was to reject the appeal as not maintainable or return the papers to the appellant for presentation before the appropriate forum.

Conclusion: The Tribunal had no power to transfer the non-maintainable appeal to another authority; the answer is against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order of the Tribunal was set aside and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Ancillary procedural powers cannot be invoked to transfer or dispose of an appeal when the Tribunal lacks substantive jurisdiction to entertain it; in such cases, the appeal must be rejected as not maintainable or returned to the proper forum.

---