Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal allowed: Loan-funded LIC premiums qualify for deduction under section 80C</h1> The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, determining that LIC premiums paid out of loan funds are eligible for deduction under section 80C, as the ... Deduction u/s 80C on the LIC premium paid in respect of his LIC policies paid out of loan funds - CIT(A) disallowed the claim - Held that:- The provisions of sec. 80C, as applicable to the year under consideration, do not specify the condition that the LIC premium payments should be paid out of income chargeable to tax. Further, as stated earlier, section 80C is included in Part-B of Chapter VI-A of the Act which provides for deduction in respect of certain payments. Only certain sections included in Part-B of Chapter VI-A contain the words “out of income chargeable to tax” and certain sections do not contain the above said words, i.e., within the sections included in Par-B of Chapter VI-A of the Act, the parliament has prescribed the condition that the payments should have been made out of income chargeable to tax only in certain sections, meaning thereby, the parliament has consciously omitted the above said condition in certain sections. As stated earlier, no such condition is prescribed in sec. 80C . It is a well settled proposition of law that one cannot supplement or add words to a section, which are not intended to be included by the parliament. Thus the payment of LIC premiums made during the previous year out of loan funds are also eligible for deduction u/s 80C - appeal of the assessee allowed. Issues Involved:1. Whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under section 80C of the Income Tax Act for LIC premiums paid by his grandfather.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Deduction under Section 80C for LIC Premiums Paid by Grandfather:Background and Facts:The appeal concerns the assessment year 2006-07, where the assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 1 lakh under section 80C for LIC premiums. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the deduction, noting that the premiums were paid by the assessee's grandfather and shown as assets in the books of the grandfather's proprietary concern, M/s S. Veeraiah Reddiar.First Appellate Authority's Decision:The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, emphasizing that the deduction under section 80C is available only to the person who actually makes the payment. The CIT(A) referred to Circular No. 3-P dated 11.10.1965, which clarifies that section 80C aims to encourage thrift and savings by the assessee, implying that the contributions should be made from the assessee's funds.Arguments by Assessee:The assessee argued that he derived income from salary and other sources and did not need to maintain books of accounts. The LIC premiums were paid by his grandfather and debited to the assessee's account in the grandfather's proprietary concern. The assessee contended that the non-maintenance of books should not alter the nature of the loan transaction. He further argued that the current provisions of section 80C do not require the payments to be made out of income chargeable to tax, unlike the old provisions.Arguments by Department:The Department contended that the LIC premiums were shown as assets in the books of the grandfather's proprietary concern, indicating no loan was taken by the assessee. The Department argued that payments under section 80C should be made out of income chargeable to tax, citing the decision in CIT Vs. Abraham George (242 ITR 171).Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not maintain books of accounts and that the LIC premiums were reflected in the books of the grandfather's proprietary concern. The Tribunal observed that the payments were made by the grandfather to M/s Seematti, where the assessee worked, indicating that the funds were provided by the grandfather. Thus, it could be inferred that the assessee availed a loan from his grandfather for the LIC premium payments.Interpretation of Section 80C:The Tribunal examined whether LIC premiums paid out of loan funds are eligible for deduction under section 80C. It distinguished the current provisions from the old provisions, noting that the current section 80C does not contain the words 'out of income chargeable to tax.' The Tribunal emphasized that section 80C is included in Part-B of Chapter VI-A, which deals with deductions for certain payments, unlike Part-C, which deals with deductions for certain incomes.Precedents and Legal Interpretations:The Tribunal referred to the Bombay High Court's decision in S. Inder Singh Gill, which interpreted the provisions of the 1922 Act, and noted that the absence of the words 'out of income chargeable to tax' in the current section 80C does make a difference. The Tribunal also noted that the Kerala High Court's decision in Abraham George pertained to the old provisions of section 80C, which explicitly required payments to be made out of income chargeable to tax.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the payment of LIC premiums out of loan funds is eligible for deduction under section 80C, as the current provisions do not specify that the payments must be made out of income chargeable to tax. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the AO to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee.Final Judgment:The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found