Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank attachment and recovery notice issued before completion of assessment and without prior notice and opportunity of hearing were valid under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: Section 65 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 permits inspection, verification, seizure of records and inquiry, but does not authorise immediate recovery of tax merely on the basis of detected discrepancies. Section 45 contemplates recovery only through the assessing authority and only after a due assessment and notice of demand. The attachment of the petitioner's bank account was made straightaway after inspection, without issuing a notice pointing out the discrepancies, without affording an opportunity to explain, and without any assessed demand. Such pre-assessment recovery bypassed the statutory procedure and offended the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The bank attachment notice was illegal and unsustainable; it was set aside and the writ petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Recovery of alleged tax dues under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 cannot be effected before assessment and notice of demand, and inspection powers do not include authority for immediate pre-assessment attachment without hearing the assessee.