Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal orders interest reconsideration & profit reduction in favor of assessee</h1> The Tribunal directed a reconsideration of the disallowance of interest amounting to Rs.31,872 for lack of evidence, emphasizing the need for a decision ... Profit on sale of flats - assessee is a builder into constructing two buildings at Bhayander - whether the A.O. was justified in taxing 15% of payments in respect of 5 flats for which the possession was given by the assessee in the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration - assessee submitted that following percentage completion method which stands accepted by the Revenue - Held that:- The amount of work in progress in respect of these five flats at the rate of 31.65% was included in the overall 31.65% of WIP, which the assessee offered for taxation, after deduction of expenses. With the making of separate addition by the AO at the rate of 15% profit on 100% of the amount in respect of these flats, some part of these amounts got doubly included, once, when the assessee voluntarily offered at 31.65% of the total WIP and secondly when the AO brought to tax the profit on 100% in respect of receipts from these flat owners. Since the proceedings for all the years up to A.Y. 2004-2005 have been concluded and in the years following the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, the assessee has followed the same method of accounting by also considering same percentage in respect of these five flats in each of the years, no final reduction can now be done to reduce the income for the subsequent years. It would be just and fair if the percentage of profit from 15% as applied by the A.O. and confirmed in the first appeal is reduced to 10% to set off the effect of double inclusion of the amount in respect of these five flats in this year and subsequent years - appeal of assessee partly allowed. Issues involved:1. Disallowance of interest amounting to Rs.31,872.2. Addition of profit on sale of flats at Rs.4,85,400.Issue 1: Disallowance of interest amounting to Rs.31,872:The appeal was against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the assessment year 2000-2001. The Assessing Officer disallowed interest of Rs.31,872 claimed by the assessee due to lack of evidence. The CIT(A) failed to decide on this issue. The Tribunal set aside the order and restored the matter to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits, emphasizing the need for justice to be served adequately.Issue 2: Addition of profit on sale of flats at Rs.4,85,400:The assessee, a builder, was following the percentage completion method for income recognition from two projects. The Assessing Officer added Rs.4,85,400 as profit on the sale of flats based on inquiries revealing receipts from flat owners. The Tribunal noted the consistent application of the percentage completion method by the assessee over the years. It held that the AO's approach of taxing 15% of payments for possession of flats was not entirely justified. The Tribunal concluded that a reduction to 10% was appropriate to offset the double inclusion of amounts from these transactions. As a result, the addition was reduced to Rs.3,23,600. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.In summary, the judgment addressed two main issues: the disallowance of interest amounting to Rs.31,872 and the addition of profit on the sale of flats at Rs.4,85,400. The Tribunal directed a reconsideration of the interest disallowance issue for a decision on merits. Regarding the profit addition, the Tribunal found the AO's approach unjustified and reduced the addition to Rs.3,23,600 to rectify the double inclusion of amounts, partially allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found