TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court approves amalgamation scheme between Indo Continental Hotels & Hotel Pink City Pvt. Ltd.</h1> <h3>Indo Continental Hotels And Resorts Limited And Hotel Pink City Pvt. Limited (In Re)</h3> The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation between Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd. (transferee-company) and Hotel Pink City Pvt. Ltd. ... Tax Avoidance Issues Involved:1. Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. Approval of the Scheme by shareholders and creditors.3. Compliance with statutory requirements.4. Fairness and reasonableness of the Scheme.5. Public interest and tax implications.Detailed Analysis:1. Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956The petitions were filed by Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd. (transferee-company) and Hotel Pink City Pvt. Ltd. (transferor-company) under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking the court's sanction for a scheme of amalgamation. The transferee-company was incorporated on May 2, 1970, and the transferor-company on April 26, 1973. The amalgamation aimed to consolidate resources, reduce costs, and improve financial stability and operational efficiency.2. Approval of the Scheme by Shareholders and CreditorsSeparate meetings of the creditors and members of both companies were convened to consider the proposed scheme. The meetings were held on July 10, 1988, and the scheme was approved with a modification in the share exchange ratio. Instead of five equity shares of Rs. 10 each for one equity share of Rs. 100 of the transferor-company, four equity shares of Rs. 10 each were to be allotted. The resolutions were passed by the statutory majority.3. Compliance with Statutory RequirementsThe court ensured compliance with statutory requirements by appointing chairmen for the meetings and scrutinizing the reports submitted. Notices were served to the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director, Company Law Board. A Chartered Accountant was appointed to assist the Official Liquidator, who confirmed that the scheme was not prejudicial to the interests of the members, shareholders, creditors, and employees of the transferor-company.4. Fairness and Reasonableness of the SchemeThe court examined whether the scheme was fair and reasonable. The principles laid down by the Madras High Court in In re Coimbatore Cotton Mills Ltd. and Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd. were considered. The court found that the scheme was approved by a statutory majority, was fair and reasonable, and was in the interest of both the members and creditors of the companies. The value of shares post-amalgamation was found to be favorable for the shareholders of the transferor-company.5. Public Interest and Tax ImplicationsThe Income-tax Department raised concerns about potential tax avoidance. However, the court noted that the amalgamation was aimed at business consolidation and operational efficiency, not tax avoidance. The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in McDowell and Co. Ltd. v. CTO, emphasizing that legitimate tax planning within the law is permissible. The court concluded that the amalgamation was in public interest, providing better facilities for tourists and generating employment.Conclusion:The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation with the modification in clause 4 regarding the share exchange ratio. The scheme was found to be fair, reasonable, and in the interest of the members, creditors, and public. The amalgamation was to take effect from April 1, 1987. The judgment emphasized that the scheme met all statutory requirements and was not aimed at tax avoidance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
