1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court directs Tribunal on legal question, emphasizing fair treatment and justice</h1> The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding the Tribunal's error in upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ... Property Issues:1. Reversal of judgment by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal2. Evidence considered by the Tribunal3. Upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)4. Ignoring material considered earlier by the Tribunal5. Determination of ownership of property and investmentAnalysis:The petitioner sought reference of questions of law to the High Court regarding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's reversal of its earlier judgment and the evidence considered. The dispute arose from the assessment year 1976-77, where the Income-tax Officer concluded that a property belonged to the respondent and not his wife. The Commissioner of Income-tax, in appeal, held the wife as the owner, leading to an appeal by the Revenue. The Tribunal recalled its earlier order, and subsequent applications were filed under section 256(1) and 256(2) for reference of the legal questions.The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding whether the Tribunal erred in upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order. The petitioner's counsel argued that this question encompassed all the points in issue, leading to the disposal of the petition without costs. The judgment highlighted the procedural history of the case, including the Tribunal rehearing the appeal and passing a fresh order, which led to the filing of the application under section 256(2) for reference to the High Court.The issues raised in the judgment revolved around the Tribunal's assessment of evidence, reversal of its earlier decision, and the ownership determination of a property. The legal battle between the parties involved the interpretation of tax laws and the application of legal principles to the facts of the case. The High Court's decision to refer the question of law for consideration indicated the complexity and significance of the legal issues involved in the dispute. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper legal reasoning and adherence to procedural requirements in tax matters, ensuring fair treatment and justice for all parties involved.