Cenvat credit for mandatory garden maintenance accepted, while GTA credit turned on contract terms and factual verification.

Cenvat credit was held admissible on garden maintenance services because the assessee was required by pollution-control permission to maintain green cover, creating a sufficient nexus with its business activity. Credit on GTA services could not be finally decided on the existing record because the purchase orders were incomplete and the FOR destination condition, together with freight and insurance components, had to be verified against the contractual terms and the applicable departmental circular. The credit claim on gardening services was therefore accepted, while the GTA issue was remanded for factual verification and fresh decision.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether cenvat credit was admissible on services used for maintaining the garden; (ii) whether cenvat credit on GTA services required verification of the purchase-order terms, including the FOR destination condition and freight or insurance components.

Issue (i): whether cenvat credit was admissible on services used for maintaining the garden.

Analysis: The appellant was required by the pollution control permission to maintain a garden and green cover as part of its statutory environmental obligation. Services used for complying with that obligation were treated as having a sufficient nexus with the business activity and were accepted as eligible for credit.

Conclusion: Credit on gardening services was held admissible and allowed in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether cenvat credit on GTA services required verification of the purchase-order terms, including the FOR destination condition and freight or insurance components.

Analysis: The available purchase orders were incomplete, and the nature of supply and inclusion of freight and insurance in the overall price had to be checked against the purchase-order conditions and the departmental circular governing the issue. The matter therefore required factual verification before a final view could be taken on admissibility.

Conclusion: The question of credit on GTA services was remanded for verification and fresh decision.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent of credit on garden maintenance services, while the question relating to GTA credit was sent back for reconsideration after verification.

Ratio Decidendi: Credit is admissible for services used to discharge a mandatory pollution-control obligation, while entitlement to GTA-related credit must be determined on the basis of the contractual and documentary terms governing the supply.

---