TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the levy of entertainment tax under the Madhya Pradesh enactment on multi-system operators was beyond the legislative competence of the State and unconstitutional, particularly in view of their liability to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The petitioners, being multi-system operators who receive and transmit television signals through cable operators to subscribers, fell within the statutory scheme treating such operators as connected with entertainment and as persons responsible for the entertainment service. The provisions defining cable operator, entertainment, proprietor, and the charging provision imposing tax on entertainment were upheld in light of binding Supreme Court decisions which had already recognized the State's competence to levy entertainment tax on multi-system operators because of their direct and close nexus with the entertainment provided to viewers. The Court also relied on the principle that the existence of service tax liability under the Central Act does not exclude the State's power to impose entertainment tax under the State enactment.
Conclusion: The constitutional challenge failed and the impugned provisions were upheld; the petitions were dismissed.
TaxTMI 
