1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Allahabad High Court cancels Rs. 75,000 income tax penalty, citing changes in law and no income concealment</h1> The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee in an income tax penalty case, canceling a penalty of Rs. 75,000. The court found that the ... Burden Of Proof, Penalty The High Court of Allahabad delivered a judgment on an income tax penalty case. The court addressed two questions posed by the Tribunal. Regarding the first question, the court found that the principle from the case of CIT v. Anwar Ali does not apply due to the introduction of an Explanation in the Income-tax Act. For the second question, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty of Rs. 75,000 was cancelled.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
