Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue recovery notice issued for realising the sales tax-related dues was liable to be interfered with on the ground that the petitioner was not a defaulter.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged the recovery notice on the premise that no tax liability was outstanding. On instructions obtained from the department, it was found that penalties had been levied for non-filing of returns and non-renewal of registration for different periods, and that the total amount due from the petitioner was the amount sought to be recovered. In view of these admitted departmental instructions, the factual basis of the challenge was not correct, and no ground was made out for interference with the recovery action.
Conclusion: The recovery proceedings were upheld and the writ petition was dismissed.