Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>CESTAT Chennai: Bonafide purchasers must predeposit duty for using fraudulent DEPB scrips</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled that M/s. Glory Impex, M/s. K.T.V. Oil Mills Ltd., M/s. Crystal Traders, and M/s. Jupiter Trading Corporation, ... Waiver of pre-deposit - Purchase of fraudulent DEPB scrips - Section 129E of the Customs Act. - Used to discharge the duty liabilities at the time of clearance of the goods - Applicants are involved in import against the fraudulent DEPB scrips obtained by them from one of the broker namely V. Sankaran - Applicant contended that the applicants except V. Sankaran are bonafide purchasers of DEPB scrips and they were not involved in purchase of fraudulent or fake DEPB scrips Held that:- As regards V. Sankaran, we find that it is a case of fraud played by V. Sankaran actively in the matter. Therefore, direct V. Sankaran to make a predeposit of 50% of the penalty amounts confirmed against him And direct the other applicants to predeposit the amount of duty confirmed less already paid. Issues:Waiver of predeposit of duty, interest, and penalty for multiple applicants under the Customs Act, 1962.Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI involved multiple applicants seeking a waiver of predeposit of duty, interest, and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962. The applicants, including M/s. Glory Impex, M/s. K.T.V. Oil Mills Ltd., M/s. Crystal Traders, and M/s. Jupiter Trading Corporation, claimed to be bonafide purchasers of DEPB scrips and argued that they had discharged duty liabilities at the time of goods clearance. However, it was revealed during the investigation that the applicants were involved in importing goods using fraudulent DEPB scrips obtained from a broker named V. Sankaran. The Tribunal noted that duty was demanded, along with interest and penalties imposed on all applicants, as well as penalties on the broker, V. Sankaran.The Tribunal considered the submissions made on behalf of the applicants, emphasizing that, except for V. Sankaran, they were bonafide purchasers who were not complicit in acquiring fraudulent DEPB scrips. The applicants claimed to have lodged complaints with the police against the brokers, leading to arrests and informing customs authorities. After hearing the arguments and examining the records, the Tribunal concluded that duty payment was necessary due to the importation using fraudulent DEPB scrips. Citing a previous decision, the Tribunal directed M/s. Glory Impex, M/s. K.T.V. Oil Mills Ltd., M/s. Crystal Traders, and M/s. Jupiter Trading Corporation to predeposit the confirmed duty amount less what was already paid within 12 weeks, with compliance to be reported by a specified date. Interest and penalties were waived during the appeal process for these applicants.Regarding V. Sankaran, the Tribunal found his active involvement in the fraud. Consequently, V. Sankaran was directed to make a predeposit of 50% of the confirmed penalty amounts within 12 weeks, with compliance reporting required by a specified date. The balance of the penalty was to be waived during the pendency of the appeals. The judgment was dictated and pronounced in open court by the Tribunal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found