Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (2) TMI 305 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court Decisions on Income Tax Deductions and Expenditure Classification The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80HHE of the Income-tax Act. However, the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          High Court Decisions on Income Tax Deductions and Expenditure Classification

                          The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80HHE of the Income-tax Act. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue on the classification of expenditure on building repairs as revenue rather than capital. Additionally, the court held that contributions made to the traffic police were not deductible under section 37 of the Act. The High Court allowed certain appeals, setting aside the Tribunal's orders in some instances but confirming them on other aspects.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deduction under section 80HHE of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Classification of expenditure on building repairs as capital or revenue.
                          3. Deduction of contributions made to traffic police under section 37 of the Income-tax Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deduction under section 80HHE of the Income-tax Act:
                          The core issue was whether the foreign exchange expenditure incurred by the assessee should be excluded while computing the deduction under section 80HHE of the Act. The Tribunal initially held that the expenses incurred in foreign currency were for the development and export of software, and thus should not be excluded from the export turnover. However, the High Court found this conclusion erroneous. It emphasized that the certificate issued by the chartered accountant under section 80HHE(4) of the Act indicated that the foreign exchange expenditure was for providing technical services outside India, not for the export or transmission of software. Consequently, the High Court ruled that the expenditure incurred for technical services outside India should be excluded from the export turnover for the purpose of deduction under section 80HHE. This substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.

                          2. Classification of expenditure on building repairs as capital or revenue:
                          The Tribunal had held that the expenditure of Rs. 15,89,613 incurred by the assessee on brick works, cement, plastering, painting walls, laying ceramic tiles, M.S. grill, internal sanitary fixtures, sewerage works, and water supply pipes on leased premises was revenue in nature. The High Court upheld this view, stating that the repairs were necessary for the business and to improve the office ambiance. The repairs were not of an enduring nature and were essential for the business operations. The court distinguished this case from the Supreme Court's decision in Ballimal Naval Kishore v. CIT, where extensive repairs to a purchased property were deemed capital expenditure. Here, the premises were leased, and the repairs were required to make the space suitable for business, thus qualifying as revenue expenditure. This question of law was answered against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee.

                          3. Deduction of contributions made to traffic police under section 37 of the Income-tax Act:
                          The Tribunal had allowed the deduction of Rs. 6.93 lakhs contributed to the Bangalore traffic police for regulating traffic at Hosur Road under section 37 of the Act, considering it a business compulsion. However, the High Court disagreed, stating that regulating traffic is a duty of the police and any contribution towards it can be considered a donation, not a business expenditure. The court cited the Division Bench decision in CIT v. Neelavathi, which held that such contributions do not qualify for deduction under section 37. Therefore, the High Court ruled that the contribution to the traffic police could not be deducted under section 37, answering this question of law in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.

                          Order:
                          The High Court allowed I.T.A. Nos. 2972 of 2005 and 2974 of 2005, setting aside the Tribunal's order in I.T.A. Nos. 794/Bang/1998 and 795/Bang/1998. In I.T.A. No. 2973 of 2005, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order regarding the deduction under section 80HHE and the contribution to the traffic police but confirmed the Tribunal's order on other aspects.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found