TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Payments to Non-Residents for Repairs Not Taxable in India: Tribunal Decision</h1> <h3>Bosch Ltd. Versus Income-tax Officer, International Taxation, Bangalore</h3> Bosch Ltd. Versus Income-tax Officer, International Taxation, Bangalore - TMI Issues Involved:1. Nature of payments made to non-residents (business profits vs. fees for technical services).2. Applicability of Section 206AA regarding higher TDS rates due to non-availability of PAN.3. Grossing up of income under Section 195A for TDS purposes.Detailed Analysis:1. Nature of Payments Made to Non-Residents:The primary issue was whether the payments made by the assessee to foreign suppliers for repairs and annual maintenance contracts (AMC) should be classified as business profits or fees for technical services (FTS). The assessee argued that these payments were business profits arising in Germany and not taxable in India since the non-residents did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. The CIT(A) concluded that the payments were FTS and taxable in India, irrespective of whether the services were rendered in India or if the non-residents had a business connection in India, based on the explanation to Section 9(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Upon appeal, the Tribunal examined the nature of the services rendered by the non-residents. It was found that the services were purely for repairs and did not involve any technical, consultation, or managerial services. The Tribunal referenced the Hyderabad Bench's decision in BHEL-GE-GAS Turbine Servicing (P) Ltd., which held that repairs do not fall under the category of technical services. Consequently, the Tribunal determined that the payments were business income, not FTS, and since the non-residents did not have a PE in India, their income was not chargeable to tax in India. Therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195.2. Applicability of Section 206AA:The second issue was the applicability of Section 206AA, which mandates a higher TDS rate of 20% if the payee does not provide a PAN. The assessee contended that non-residents were not required to obtain a PAN as per Section 139A(8)(d) and Rule 114(1)(b) of the Income-tax Rules. The CIT(A) held that Section 206AA overrides other provisions, and the requirement to obtain a PAN applies to all non-residents for payments liable to TDS.The Tribunal, however, found that since the payments were determined to be business income and not FTS, the provisions of Section 206AA were not applicable. The Tribunal further noted that the CIT(A)'s reliance on the CBDT press release was misplaced as it cannot override the statutory provisions.3. Grossing Up of Income Under Section 195A:The final issue was the grossing up of income for TDS purposes under Section 195A. The assessee argued that the grossing up should be done at the rates specified in the DTAA (10%) or the rates in force (10.5575%) rather than the 20% specified under Section 206AA. The CIT(A) had held that the grossing up should be done at 20%.The Tribunal clarified that Section 195A requires grossing up at the rates in force for the financial year in which the income is payable, not at the rate specified under Section 206AA. Therefore, the grossing up should be done at the applicable rates in force or as per the DTAA, whichever is beneficial to the assessee.Conclusion:- The payments made by the assessee to non-residents for repairs were classified as business income, not FTS, and hence not taxable in India due to the absence of a PE.- Section 206AA was not applicable since the payments were not FTS.- Grossing up of income for TDS purposes should be done at the rates in force or as per the DTAA, not at the higher rate specified under Section 206AA.Judgment:- The appeals in ITA Nos. 552, 553, 554 & 555/Bang/2011 were allowed, concluding that the payments were business income not subject to TDS.- The appeals in ITA Nos. 556, 557 & 558/Bang/2011 were partly allowed, affirming the applicability of Section 206AA for technical services but clarifying the correct method for grossing up under Section 195A.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
