Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (12) TMI 686 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal affirms tax treatment of asset distribution as capital gains under The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's decision in treating the distribution of assets as a transfer of capital assets under section 45(4) of the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal affirms tax treatment of asset distribution as capital gains under

                          The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's decision in treating the distribution of assets as a transfer of capital assets under section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the Assessing Officer's computation of long-term capital gains was correct and reversed the relief granted to the assessee by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, concluding that the valuation and inclusion of assets in the capital gains computation were appropriate.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Valuation of land in addition to house building at Kathi Darwaza.
                          2. Existence of asset on the date of transfer for land at Gulmarg.
                          3. Existence of asset on the date of transfer for Gulmarg Hut.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Valuation of Land in Addition to House Building at Kathi Darwaza:
                          The Revenue questioned whether the CIT(A) was correct in taking the value of land in addition to the house building at Kathi Darwaza when the book value of the land was not separately accounted for by the assessee while distributing the asset among its partners. The Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee distributed certain fixed assets to its partners, including a residential house valued at Rs.18,00,000/-. The AO argued that the entire value of the fixed assets was equally distributed among the partners, crediting their current capital accounts. The AO believed this distribution fell under section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, which pertains to the transfer of capital assets by way of distribution. The CIT(A) initially dismissed the assessee's claim, agreeing with the AO that land could not be segregated from the residence and both should be valued together. The Tribunal upheld the AO's view that the valuation of Rs.18,00,000/- was correct as the assessee did not object to this value during the assessment proceedings.

                          2. Existence of Asset on the Date of Transfer for Land at Gulmarg:
                          The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in treating that no asset existed on the date of transfer for the land at Gulmarg, which had a book value of Rs.35,304/-. The AO noted that the land at Gulmarg was taken on lease and subsequently transferred to the firm, making the firm a deemed owner under section 269UA(f) of the Income Tax Act. The AO treated this as a transfer of capital assets under section 45(4). However, the CIT(A) found that the land at Gulmarg was on lease from the Development Authority, similar to the shop at Bund, which was not considered an asset transfer by the AO. The Tribunal agreed with the AO's view that the land at Gulmarg, being on lease for more than 12 years, made the assessee a deemed owner, thus supporting the AO's inclusion of this land in the capital gains computation.

                          3. Existence of Asset on the Date of Transfer for Gulmarg Hut:
                          The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision that no asset existed on the date of transfer for the Gulmarg Hut, which had a book value of Rs.61,834/-. The AO observed that the Gulmarg Hut was dismantled, and a new building was being constructed over the land. The AO included the value of the Gulmarg Hut in the capital gains computation, considering it a transfer of capital assets under section 45(4). The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's claim that no asset existed for transfer as the hut was being reconstructed, supported by the remand report indicating ongoing construction work. The Tribunal, however, found that the CIT(A)'s order was not a speaking order and upheld the AO's decision to include the value of the Gulmarg Hut in the capital gains computation, as the dismantling and reconstruction did not negate the existence of an asset at the time of transfer.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the AO correctly applied section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act in treating the distribution of assets as a transfer of capital assets. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the AO's computation of long-term capital gains and allowed the Revenue's appeal, reversing the CIT(A)'s relief to the assessee.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found