Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants Revenue appeal, excludes foreign currency expenses for Section 10B deduction.

        The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle IV(4), Chennai Versus M/s New Gen Imaging Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Others

        The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle IV(4), Chennai Versus M/s New Gen Imaging Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Others - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Condonation of delay in filing cross-objections.
        2. Exclusion of foreign currency expenses from export turnover under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
        3. Non-exclusion of such amounts from total turnover.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Condonation of Delay in Filing Cross-Objections:
        The cross-objections filed by the assessee were delayed by 117 days. The assessee provided reasons for the delay, and the Revenue did not raise any serious objections. The tribunal found the reasons justifiable, condoned the delay, and admitted the cross-objections.

        2. Exclusion of Foreign Currency Expenses from Export Turnover:
        The assessee, engaged in e-publishing and photo typesetting for foreign publishers, claimed relief under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) noted that the assessee incurred expenses in foreign currency for business promotion, foreign travel, job work charges, salary, commission, internet charges, training expenses, marketing consultancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The A.O. excluded these expenses from the export turnover as per clause (iii) of Explanation 2 to Section 10B of the Act but did not exclude them from the total turnover.

        The assessee argued that these expenses should not be excluded from the export turnover as they were not for technical services rendered to third parties outside India. The CIT(Appeals) agreed with the assessee, citing the Special Bench decision in Zylog Systems Ltd v ITO, which held that expenses incurred in foreign currency for technical services not rendered to third parties should not be excluded from export turnover.

        However, the tribunal noted that in the assessee's own case for earlier years (2001-02, 2003-04, and 2004-05), it was held that the services rendered by Ms. Anitha Madhavan were technical in nature. The tribunal emphasized that the decision in Zylog Systems Ltd. did not apply as the assessee did not have a foreign branch, and the expenses were not incurred for its own staff but for an agent. The tribunal concluded that the expenses incurred in foreign currency should be excluded from the export turnover as they were for technical services rendered outside India.

        3. Non-Exclusion of Such Amounts from Total Turnover:
        The assessee raised the issue that if the expenses were excluded from the export turnover, they should also be excluded from the total turnover. The CIT(Appeals) did not adjudicate on this issue. The tribunal, referring to the Special Bench decision in ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd., held that items excluded from export turnover should also be excluded from total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 10B of the Act. The tribunal directed the A.O. to exclude the foreign currency expenses from both the export turnover and the total turnover while re-computing the deduction.

        Conclusion:
        In conclusion, the tribunal allowed the appeals of the Revenue and the cross-objections of the assessee. The orders of the CIT(Appeals) were set aside, and the A.O.'s computation was reinstated with the direction to exclude the foreign currency expenses from both the export turnover and the total turnover for the purpose of computing the deduction under Section 10B of the Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found