TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of appellant on Central Excise Tariff notification issue</h1> <h3>M/s. Janata Rubber & Engg. Works Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V</h3> M/s. Janata Rubber & Engg. Works Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V - TMI Issues:1. Applicability of notification No. 162/86-CE to bodies built on chassis under heading 87.07 of the Central Excise Tariff.Analysis:The appellant filed an appeal against an order confirming a demand and penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The issue revolved around the denial of benefit under notification No. 162/86-CE to bodies built on chassis classified under heading 87.07 of the Central Excise Tariff. The appellant argued that a similar case had been decided in favor of the body builders in a previous tribunal case. The Revenue contended that the bodies built by the appellant fell under heading 87.07 and thus were not eligible for the notification's benefit.The Tribunal considered the submissions and noted that the appellant, as an independent body builder, received duty-paid chassis to build bodies on motor vehicles. It was highlighted that building a body on a chassis amounts to the manufacture of a motor vehicle. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions affirming that bodies built on chassis remain classifiable under heading 87.07. The Central Government had issued a notification exempting duty on bodies built by independent body builders on chassis where duty had been short-levied during a specified period. As the appellants had paid duty under relevant headings, they were deemed eligible for the notification's benefit, absolving them from any further duty payment.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision was based on the applicability of the notification and the classification of bodies built on chassis under heading 87.07 of the Central Excise Tariff. The appellants were granted consequential relief as per the law.
TaxTMI 