Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Approval of Scheme of Arrangement under Companies Act - Detailed Meeting Regulations and Immediate Action Order</h1> <h3>SARGAM LABORATORY PVT. LTD. & OTHER Versus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</h3> SARGAM LABORATORY PVT. LTD. & OTHER Versus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - TMI Issues:1. Application under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme of Arrangement.2. Jurisdiction of High Court in connection with the Scheme.3. Details of incorporation and financials of the Transferee Company.4. Approval of the proposed scheme by both companies.5. Dispensation of meetings requirement for Transferor Company.6. Consent and approval status of shareholders and creditors.7. Requirement of convening separate meetings for various stakeholders.8. Appointment of Chairperson and Alternate Chairperson for unsecured creditors' meeting.9. Quorum and proxy regulations for the meetings.10. Publication and notice requirements for the proposed meetings.11. Filing of reports by Chairpersons/Alternate Chairpersons post meetings.Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to a first motion application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, concerning a Scheme of Arrangement between a Transferor Company and a Transferee Company. The application includes details of the proposed scheme, company financials, and approvals obtained.2. The Transferor Company's registered office is in Chennai, under the jurisdiction of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, while the Transferee Company's office is in Delhi, within the jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court. The application seeks appropriate directions from the Delhi High Court due to the Transferee Company's location.3. The application provides detailed information on the Transferee Company's incorporation, authorized capital, issued capital, subscribed capital, and paid-up capital, along with the submission of relevant documents like Memorandum, Articles of Association, and financial accounts.4. Both the Transferor and Transferee Companies have approved the proposed scheme, as evidenced by board resolutions and consents obtained from shareholders and creditors.5. The Transferor Company's requirement of holding meetings, including shareholder meetings, was dispensed with by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, as per an order dated August 29, 2012, due to its location in Chennai.6. The application outlines the consent status of shareholders and creditors, with specific details on the number of shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors, consents received, and the percentage of consent in value.7. The judgment addresses the need for separate meetings of equity shareholders, secured creditors, and unsecured creditors of the Transferee Company based on the consents received and the value of debts.8. The Court appoints a Chairperson and an Alternate Chairperson for the unsecured creditors' meeting, along with secretarial assistance, and sets their fees for conducting the meeting.9. Quorum requirements for the meetings, including the consideration of valid proxies, are established to ensure the meetings' validity and decision-making process.10. Detailed instructions are provided regarding the publication of advance notices of proposed meetings in newspapers, individual notice dispatch, and the conduct of meetings in a fair manner.11. The Chairpersons and Alternate Chairpersons are directed to submit reports within two weeks post meetings, and the application is allowed in the specified terms, with an order for immediate action.This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, providing a detailed understanding of the legal proceedings and requirements involved in the Scheme of Arrangement between the two companies.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found