Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a refund claim under the Customs Act is maintainable without first challenging the provisional or final assessment of the Bill of Entry.
Analysis: The assessment included provisional assessment within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The importer paid duty under protest and reserved liberty to appeal, but no appeal was filed against either the provisional assessment or the final assessment. Relying on the settled principle that a refund proceeding cannot be used to indirectly question an assessment order, the Tribunal held that the ratio of Priya Blue Industries continued to apply. The absence of a speaking order did not change the position, because an assessed Bill of Entry remained appealable and the refund authority could not sit in appeal over the assessment. The Tribunal also held that the later challenge to the correctness of the assessment through refund proceedings was not maintainable.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable and the rejection of the claim was upheld.