Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Notification No. 38/2007-C.E., duty under the compounded levy scheme could be enhanced by imputing a retail sale price to pouches manufactured for export on which no retail sale price was required to be printed, and whether the resulting duty demand, interest and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The notification fixed duty per packing machine only with reference to the retail sale price printed on pouches. The exported pouches were not required to bear a retail sale price, and the Revenue's attempt to determine a notional retail sale price by its own method had no statutory basis. The scheme did not contemplate adding a deemed retail sale price to export clearances merely because the machine was also used for such goods. In these circumstances, the demand founded on such calculation could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The duty demand, interest and penalty were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a compounded levy notification links duty liability to the retail sale price printed on pouches, the Revenue cannot substitute a notional retail sale price for goods not required to carry such marking unless the notification expressly authorises that method.