1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rules subsidy from SIPCOT doesn't reduce plant cost for tax purposes</h1> The High Court of Madras held that the subsidy received from SIPCOT did not reduce the actual cost of plant and machinery for depreciation and development ... Actual Cost, Depreciation, Developement Rebate The High Court of Madras, in a tax case reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, ruled that the subsidy received from SIPCOT did not reduce the actual cost of plant and machinery for depreciation and development rebate. The court cited a recent decision in Srinivas Industries v. CIT [1991] 188 ITR 22 and ruled in favor of the taxpayer. No costs were awarded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
