1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal rules against Education Cess credit, annuls penalty under Section 76</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled that the appellant is not entitled to credit for Education Cess and annulled the penalty under Section 76 ... Penalty β Held that:- Education Cess is meant for specific purpose i.e. for welfare of the state, the appellant is not entitled to get credit of the same - Looking to the welfare aspect of the law, there should not be penalty on the appellant under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 - appeal is partly allowed annulling penalty. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, in the case of 2012 (9) TMI 488, ruled that the appellant is not entitled to credit for Education Cess of Rs. 11,239 as it is meant for the welfare of the state. The penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, was annulled in consideration of the welfare aspect of the law. The appeal was partly allowed, and the stay application was disposed of.