Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (8) TMI 631 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal remands case on Dumb Barge & Tug penalties, duty liability, importation validity The Tribunal remanded the case involving the confiscation of Dumb Barge Star-3002 and Tug Century Star-1, imposition of penalties on various parties, duty ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal remands case on Dumb Barge & Tug penalties, duty liability, importation validity

                            The Tribunal remanded the case involving the confiscation of Dumb Barge Star-3002 and Tug Century Star-1, imposition of penalties on various parties, duty liability on the Dumb Barge under the Customs Act, and validity of importation and coastal run conversion. The Tribunal found similarities with a previous case and ordered a re-examination by the Original Authority, emphasizing that duty cannot be demanded again if already paid. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present additional evidence for reconsideration.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Confiscation of Dumb Barge Star-3002 and Tug Century Star-1.
                            2. Imposition of penalties on various parties.
                            3. Liability of duty on the Dumb Barge under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.
                            4. Validity of the importation and coastal run conversion of the Dumb Barge.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Confiscation of Dumb Barge Star-3002 and Tug Century Star-1:
                            The Revenue initiated proceedings on the grounds that the Dumb Barge Star-3002 entered India illegally without declaration and was off-loaded at an unapproved place. The Commissioner ordered the confiscation of the Dumb Barge under Section 111(a), (d), (f), (g), and (h) of the Customs Act, 1962, with an option to redeem it on payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 30,00,000. Similarly, the Tug Century Star-1 was ordered to be confiscated under Section 115 of the Customs Act, 1962, with an option to redeem it on payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000.

                            2. Imposition of Penalties on Various Parties:
                            Penalties were imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, on several parties involved:
                            - Capt. Suran Shanmugam, Master of the Tug Century Star-1, was fined Rs. 1,00,000.
                            - M/s Century Star Shipping Pvt. Ltd. was fined Rs. 30,00,000.
                            - M/s Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. was fined Rs. 10,00,000.
                            - M/s B.Ghosh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. was fined Rs. 10,00,000.
                            - M/s Babaji Shivaram Clearing and Carriers Pvt. Ltd. was fined Rs. 2,00,000.
                            No penalties were imposed on other noticees (Nos. 3, 4, 6, 7, and 11).

                            3. Liability of Duty on the Dumb Barge Under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962:
                            The Department appealed, arguing that the Commissioner erred in not confirming the duty liability on the Dumb Barge Star-3002 under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Department contended that the adjudicating authority should have settled the valuation issue first and then fixed the appropriate duty liability. The contention was that the barge was dutiable under Section 111(f), (g), and (h) of the Customs Act, 1962.

                            4. Validity of the Importation and Coastal Run Conversion of the Dumb Barge:
                            The Appellant, M/s Century Star Shipping Ltd., contended that the Dumb Barge was imported into India in 2006 with permission from DG-Shipping and was converted for coastal run by Customs Authorities at Paradip upon payment of duty. They argued that once a vessel is assessed to duty and cleared for home consumption, it ceases to be imported goods and becomes a foreign-going vessel, thus not liable for further customs duty for movements in and out of the country. They relied on the Tribunal's decision in the case of Noble Asset Co. Ltd. vs. CC(Prev.), which held that such vessels are not required to file an import manifest declaring the barge as goods.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal found that the facts and circumstances of the cited case were similar to the instant case and that the arguments required re-examination. It was noted that if duty had already been suffered, it could not be demanded again. The case was remanded to the Original Authority to re-examine the aspects and decide the case while keeping in view the Tribunal's decision in the case of Noble Asset Co. Ltd. Both sides were allowed to produce supporting documents, and a reasonable opportunity was to be granted to the noticees.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found