Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment proceedings under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were valid for the relevant assessment years.
Analysis: The scope of the reference was confined to the question framed by the Tribunal. For the assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83, the material relied upon by the assessee was not shown to have been before the Assessing Officer when the original assessments were made. The Court declined to presume that the Assessing Officer necessarily carried forward knowledge of note 16 from one assessment year to another. The burden lay on the assessee to establish that the original assessments had been made after considering the relevant material. For assessment year 1983-84, even assuming that the Assessing Officer had noticed note 16, the reassessment was still supported because the assessee did not account for the arrears in the subsequent year as promised, and further information received from the Estate Manager clarified the basis of enhancement and payment, supplying additional material for belief that income had escaped assessment.
Conclusion: The reassessment under section 147(b) was upheld and the answer to the referred question was against the assessee.