Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the services rendered by the assessee were classifiable as Business Auxiliary Services and whether the claim for exemption under the relevant notifications required fresh consideration.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the assessee had provided Business Auxiliary Services. The authorities below had not examined the assessee's plea for exemption under Notification No. 14/2004-ST dated 10-09-2004 and Notification No. 6/2005-Customs dated 1-3-2005. As the exemption claim had not been tested at the earlier stage, the matter required reconsideration on that limited aspect.
Conclusion: The service was held to be Business Auxiliary Service, and the appeals were remanded for fresh consideration of the exemption claim under the notifications.