Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on outdoor catering service used for serving food to employees during the period of dispute was admissible, and whether a denial of credit could be sustained on the ground that part of the service cost was recovered from employees when that allegation was not made in the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The objection that credit was inadmissible unless the assessee proved that no part of the catering cost was recovered from employees was held to be beyond the scope of the show-cause notice, because no such allegation had been raised in the notice. The issue was also covered by the cited High Court decision in favour of the assessee.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to CENVAT credit on the outdoor catering service, and the departmental objection failed.