Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation on vehicles given on lease could be disallowed on the ground that the assessee had not proved ownership, although the lease rental was accepted as income and purchase bills and lease agreements were produced.
Analysis: The assessee had produced the original purchase bills and lease agreements and had shown the lease rentals in its accounts. The dispute arose because some lessees claimed ownership and some summons went unanswered. The legal effect of the arrangement was decisive: in a lease or hire-purchase context, ownership for motor vehicles may be concurrent, and the person in possession under such agreement is also recognised as owner under the Motor Vehicles Act. Mere statements by lessees or non-response to summons did not, by themselves, rebut the assessee's documentary proof of title. Once the lease rental was accepted, the assessment could not inconsistently deny the corresponding depreciation on the same assets without a legally sustainable basis.
Conclusion: The disallowance of depreciation was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to depreciation on the leased vehicles.
Final Conclusion: The assessment orders were set aside and the depreciation claim was upheld in full for the relevant assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: In a leasing transaction, documentary ownership and lease agreements can establish entitlement to depreciation, and acceptance of lease rental income cannot be coupled with denial of depreciation on the same assets merely on adverse inference from lessee statements or non-response to summons.