Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court approves Siemens BPO Services' Amalgamation Scheme with audit conditions</h1> <h3>Siemens Information Processing Services (P.) Ltd., In re</h3> The High Court of Karnataka allowed Company Petition 27/2011 and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation with conditions. The petitioner company, Siemens ... Amalgamation – sanction of scheme of amalgamation – company should file its Balance sheet, and profit and Loss account for the financial year 30.9.2011 before the scheme being put into operation - accounts of the petitioner company for the period 1.10.2010 to 30.9.2011 has not been audited, not approved by the Board of directors of the petitioner company, its shareholders, its creditors etc. – Held that:- proposed scheme was to be sanctioned subject to condition that audited accounts for period 1-10-2011 to 30-9-2011 would be filed with Regional Director. Issues Involved:1. Statutory compliance by the petitioner company (Second Transferor).2. Sanctioning of the Scheme of Amalgamation.3. Conditions for sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation.4. Appointment date of the Scheme of Amalgamation.5. Filing and auditing of financial accounts.6. Role of Regional Director and Official Liquidator.Detailed Analysis:Statutory Compliance by the Petitioner Company (Second Transferor):The petitioner company, 'Siemens BPO Services Pvt. Ltd.,' sought the sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. The company was incorporated on 13.10.2000 and has undergone several name changes. The petition included the necessary documents such as the Memorandum and Articles of Association, audited balance sheets, and board resolutions approving the scheme.Sanctioning of the Scheme of Amalgamation:The Scheme of Amalgamation involved the first transferor company, Siemens Corporate Finance Pvt. Ltd., and the transferee company, Siemens Information Systems Ltd. The High Court of Mumbai had already sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation subject to the order to be passed by the High Court of Karnataka.Conditions for Sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation:The court examined whether statutory compliance was made by the petitioner company. The Regional Director raised concerns about the financial accounts not being filed for the period ending 30.09.2011. The petitioner company agreed to audit and file these accounts, and an affidavit was submitted to comply with the observations made by the Registrar of Companies.Appointment Date of the Scheme of Amalgamation:The appointed date for the Scheme of Amalgamation was specified as 1.10.2011. The court noted that the latest financial position and auditors' report available were up to 30.09.2010. The court emphasized the importance of having the financial accounts up to the appointed date audited and approved to ensure transparency and compliance with statutory requirements.Filing and Auditing of Financial Accounts:The court directed the petitioner company to file the audited accounts for the period 1.10.2010 to 30.09.2011 with the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator. The court also instructed that these accounts be audited by a panel auditor and a report be submitted to the court.Role of Regional Director and Official Liquidator:The court underscored the role of the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator in scrutinizing the books and accounts of the company to ensure no prejudicial conduct against shareholders or the public. The court retained the power to supervise the implementation of the Scheme and make necessary modifications.Order:The High Court of Karnataka allowed the Company Petition 27/2011 and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation subject to the following conditions:1. The petitioner company must file the audited accounts for the period 1.10.2010 to 30.09.2011 with the Regional Director and Registrar of Companies by 30.11.2011. The Regional Director should then examine and report on these accounts within two weeks.2. The petitioner company must also serve a copy of the audited accounts to the Official Liquidator, who will get them audited by a panel auditor. The Official Liquidator must then file a report to the court.3. The Official Liquidator and Regional Director are permitted to request modifications or recall the order if the accounts are contrary to the sanctioned scheme or Companies Act provisions.4. The petitioner company must file an affidavit undertaking compliance with these conditions within ten days of receiving the order.The court's decision ensures that the Scheme of Amalgamation is sanctioned while maintaining statutory compliance and protecting the interests of shareholders and the public.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found