Appellate Tribunal rules Director not liable for service tax penalty The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the penalty imposed on the appellant, a Director of Top Security Ltd., under section 77(c) of the Finance ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules Director not liable for service tax penalty
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the penalty imposed on the appellant, a Director of Top Security Ltd., under section 77(c) of the Finance Act for delayed service tax payment is not sustainable as there is no provision for imposing personal penalty on the Director. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside without pre-deposit.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that a penalty under section 77(c) of the Finance Act imposed on the appellant, a Director of Top Security Ltd., for delayed service tax payment is not sustainable as there is no provision for imposing personal penalty on the Director. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside without pre-deposit.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.