1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal rules Director not liable for service tax penalty</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the penalty imposed on the appellant, a Director of Top Security Ltd., under section 77(c) of the Finance ... Penalty under section 77(c) on Director - delay in payment of service tax - Held that:- No provision for imposing personal penalty on the Director therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable - against revenue.. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that a penalty under section 77(c) of the Finance Act imposed on the appellant, a Director of Top Security Ltd., for delayed service tax payment is not sustainable as there is no provision for imposing personal penalty on the Director. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside without pre-deposit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
