Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from sale of DEPB were to be treated wholly as profit on transfer under section 28(iiid) or whether only the excess over the face value was taxable, and whether the matter required fresh consideration in the light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Topman Exports.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the later decision of the Supreme Court clarified the legal position that DEPB has two components for tax purposes. The face value of DEPB is cash assistance receivable against exports and falls under section 28(iiib), while only the difference between the sale price and the face value represents profit on transfer under section 28(iiid). Since the lower authorities had treated the entire sale proceeds as taxable profit on transfer, the assessment order and appellate order could not stand on the legal position declared by the Supreme Court. The proper course was to restore the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the issues were remanded to the Assessing Officer for de novo decision in accordance with the Supreme Court's interpretation of DEPB receipts.