Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Tribunal Grants Assessee Relief: Restores Registration & Exemption</h1> <h3>ACIT, Faridabad Versus M/s. Manav Rachna Educational Society, Faridabad.</h3> ACIT, Faridabad Versus M/s. Manav Rachna Educational Society, Faridabad. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Deletion of addition of Rs.9,30,850/- made on account of unexplained cash/money.2. Deletion of addition of Rs.13,38,600/- made on account of unexplained cash entries.3. Allowing registration u/s 12AA despite non-application of 85% of additional income towards charity.4. Treatment of Rs.7,89,96,478/- received as corpus donations as income of the assessee.5. Cancellation of registration granted to the assessee trust u/s 12AA.6. Denial of approval of exemption u/s 80G.Detailed Analysis:1. Deletion of Addition of Rs.9,30,850/- (Unexplained Cash/Money):The Assessing Officer made a protective addition of Rs.9,30,850/- in the hands of the assessee trust, treating the cash found at the residence of the trustees as unexplained money. The CIT (A) deleted this addition, stating that the money belonged to Manav Rachna Educational Society and M/s. Techplast India Pvt. Ltd., and was reflected in the cash books. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, noting that the revenue failed to establish any specific defects or manipulation in the books of account. The cash was kept at the trustees' residence due to security reasons, and the addition was made on a protective basis without concrete evidence. Thus, the Tribunal found no merit in the revenue's ground and dismissed it.2. Deletion of Addition of Rs.13,38,600/- (Unexplained Cash Entries):The addition of Rs.13,38,600/- was based on entries in Annexure A-47, a daybook maintained for the period 02.07.2005 to 02.08.2005. The CIT (A) deleted the addition, finding that the entries in Annexure A-47 were part of the books of account of various institutions run by the assessee. The Tribunal confirmed this, noting that the entries were reflected in the respective cash books of the institutions. Therefore, the Tribunal found no merit in the revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT (A)'s decision.3. Allowing Registration u/s 12AA:The revenue contended that the assessee did not apply 85% of the additional income of Rs.13,38,600/- towards charity or religious purposes. However, since the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal on the additions made, no additional income remained in the hands of the assessee for consideration. Thus, this ground became infructuous and was dismissed.4. Treatment of Rs.7,89,96,478/- as Income:The CIT (A) confirmed the addition of Rs.7,89,96,478/-, treating it as income and denying exemption u/s 11 on the ground that the assessee's registration u/s 12AA was cancelled. The Tribunal noted that the registration was cancelled based on additions made during assessment proceedings, which were deleted by the CIT (A). Since the registration was subsequently granted again, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and allowed the assessee's appeal.5. Cancellation of Registration u/s 12AA:The registration granted to the assessee trust was cancelled based on three additions made to the income for Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The Tribunal found that all the issues on which the registration was cancelled did not survive, as the additions were deleted in the quantum appeal. The Tribunal noted that the trust was granted registration again and found to be genuine with charitable objectives. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and restored the registration.6. Denial of Approval of Exemption u/s 80G:The CIT, Central, Ludhiana denied the approval of exemption u/s 80G based on the cancellation of the trust's registration u/s 12AA. Since the Tribunal allowed the appeal against the cancellation of registration, it also set aside the order of the CIT and directed to grant the exemption u/s 80G.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal (ITA No.1148/Del/2010) and allowed the assessee's appeals (ITA Nos.1841/Del/2011, 793/Del/2011, and 972/Del/2011), restoring the registration u/s 12AA and granting exemption u/s 80G. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decisions on the deletion of additions and found no merit in the revenue's grounds. The order was pronounced in open court on May 25, 2012.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found