Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on services used during construction of a mall was admissible to a provider of renting of immovable property service.
Analysis: The definition of input service under Rule 2(1)(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was treated as applicable to services used by a provider of taxable service for providing output service. The services taken for constructing the mall were considered integral to the creation of the premises from which the taxable renting service was subsequently provided. The Tribunal followed the reasoning that, without the construction-related services, the output service of renting the immovable property could not have come into existence, and therefore the credit could not be denied merely because the mall itself was not an excisable product or a service.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit was held admissible and the demand of service tax, along with the penalty, was set aside.