Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal's Jurisdiction to Scrutinize Search Validity for Block Assessments Emphasized by Karnataka High Court</h1> <h3>V. Ramprasad Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle - 2(2)</h3> V. Ramprasad Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle - 2(2) - TMI Issues:1. Tribunal's jurisdiction to examine the validity of a search for block assessment under the Income Tax Act.2. Validity of the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction for block assessment.3. Tribunal's power to issue notice under Section 15BBC and commence block assessment proceedings based on an appraisal report without verifying the validity of the search.Issue 1: Tribunal's Jurisdiction to Examine Validity of Search for Block Assessment:The appeal questioned the legality of a search conducted, arguing that it rendered the entire assessment void ab initio. The Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to scrutinize the search authorization as it did not directly lead to a tax demand on the assessee. The Tribunal's stance was that since the appeal was related to tax liability, it could not delve into the authorization's validity. However, the High Court, citing a previous case, clarified that in appeals challenging block assessment orders, it is within the Tribunal's purview to assess the legality of the search. The High Court emphasized that the Tribunal must first establish the search's validity before scrutinizing the block assessment order. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Tribunal's decision and remanded the matter for a fresh review in line with the legal principles established in the aforementioned case.Issue 2: Validity of Assessing Officer's Jurisdiction for Block Assessment:The second substantial question of law revolved around whether the Assessing Officer had valid jurisdiction for conducting the block assessment under Chapter XIB of the Income Tax Act. While the Tribunal's decision primarily focused on the tax liability aspect and not the search authorization, the High Court's ruling in a related case clarified that the Tribunal indeed has the authority to examine the legality of the search before proceeding with the block assessment. The High Court's decision to set aside the Tribunal's order and remand the case for a fresh review underscores the importance of establishing the validity of the search as a foundational step in block assessments to ensure the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction is legally sound.Issue 3: Tribunal's Power to Issue Notice Under Section 15BBC for Block Assessment:The third issue pertained to whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the Assessing Officer's power to issue a notice under Section 15BBC and initiate block assessment proceedings was automatic upon receiving an appraisal report, without ensuring the validity of the search. The High Court's ruling, based on the precedent set in a previous case, emphasized the necessity for the Tribunal to verify the legality of the search before proceeding with block assessments. By remanding the matter for a fresh consideration in accordance with the legal principles established in the cited case, the High Court reinforced the importance of ensuring the validity of the search as a prerequisite for commencing block assessment proceedings under Section 15BBC of the Income Tax Act.In conclusion, the judgment by the Karnataka High Court addressed critical issues concerning the Tribunal's jurisdiction to examine the validity of a search for block assessment, the necessity of verifying the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction, and the Tribunal's obligation to ensure the legality of the search before initiating block assessment proceedings. The ruling underscored the significance of establishing the validity of the search as a foundational step in block assessments, emphasizing the Tribunal's authority to scrutinize the search authorization before proceeding with the assessment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found