Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Scheme of Amalgamation Approved under Companies Act 1956 - Shareholders Back Delisting Decision</h1> The court approved the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the petitioner company and a transferee ... Scheme of amalgamation - issue of filing fee already paid by the transferor companies on their authorized share capital - Objections by the Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Chennai - issue of filing fee already paid by the transferor companies on their authorized share capital - held that:- this objection cannot be sustained, in view of the law, laid down by the Hon'ble division bench of this court, in the case of Regional Director, Ministry of Co. Affairs v. Cavin Plastics and Chemicals (P.) Ltd. (2007 (11) TMI 412 (HC)) As per the report of the chartered accountants that they have not come across any act of misfeasance by the directors, which would attract the provision of sections 542/543 of the Companies Act, 1956. Nor the affairs of the transferor company have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or public interest. There is no objection by the official liquidator to the scheme and the scheme be beneficial to the company and its members. Consequently, the company petition is conditionally ordered, subject to sanctioning of the scheme of amalgamation by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court, on the petition filed or to be filed by the transferee company. Issues:1. Scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. Approval of the scheme by the shareholders.3. Delisting of shares from stock exchanges.4. Objection by Regional Director regarding the authorized share capital.5. Official liquidator's report and absence of misfeasance.6. Conditional order subject to sanction by Calcutta High Court.7. Fixing remuneration for the Additional Central Government standing counsel.Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to a company petition filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking approval for a scheme of amalgamation between the petitioner company and a transferee company. The petitioner, a transferor company, aims to merge with the transferee company for operational efficiency and financial benefits.2. The scheme of amalgamation was approved by the shareholders in a meeting where the resolution was passed unanimously. The shareholders were to be allotted equity shares of the transferee company on a proportionate basis for every 50 equity shares held in the transferor company.3. The petitioner also applied for delisting its shares from certain stock exchanges. While the Bombay Stock Exchange had already suspended the shares, approval was pending from the Madras Stock Exchange. The transferee company's shares were listed with the Calcutta Stock Exchange, which had issued no objection to the proposed scheme.4. An objection raised by the Regional Director regarding the authorized share capital was addressed in light of a previous legal precedent. The objection was deemed unsustainable as per the law laid down by the High Court in a previous case.5. The official liquidator's report confirmed the absence of misfeasance by the directors and stated that the scheme would be beneficial to the company and its members. There were no objections raised by the official liquidator regarding the scheme.6. The judgment concluded with a conditional order, subject to the scheme's sanction by the Calcutta High Court through a petition filed by the transferee company. Additionally, the remuneration for the Additional Central Government standing counsel was fixed at Rs. 5,000 to be paid by the petitioner company.This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the legal judgment, detailing the process and considerations involved in the scheme of amalgamation and its approval.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found