Valid search authorisation upheld where credible material, recorded satisfaction, and approval supported action; Section 131(1A) did not invalidate it.

Search and seizure authorisation under Section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act was upheld because the competent authority had credible material, including enquiries, return and balance-sheet examination, and field visits, before recording satisfaction and granting approval. The Court held that the satisfaction note, authorisation, and execution of the search suffered from no legal infirmity. A notice under Section 131(1A) did not undermine validity, as that provision is merely enabling and operates before Section 132. The request to withhold the satisfaction note on privilege grounds was also rejected, and the assessee's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the search and seizure authorisation under Section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid for want of proper material, satisfaction, or approval.

Analysis: The record disclosed credible and reliable material before the competent authority, including enquiries, examination of returns and balance sheets, and field visits by the investigation wing. On that basis, the satisfaction note was recorded and administrative approval was granted. The presence of a notice under Section 131(1A) did not affect the validity of the search, as that provision is only enabling and operates in a field anterior to Section 132. The Court found no legal infirmity in the satisfaction note, the authorisation, or the execution of the search. The request to withhold the satisfaction note on privilege grounds was also rejected.

Conclusion: The search and seizure action was held valid, and the challenge raised by the assessee failed.

---