Section 80HH deduction limited to profits directly derived from industrial unit; ancillary income and other unit losses excluded

HC held that, for deduction under section 80HH, only profits and gains "derived from" the eligible industrial undertaking are relevant, adopting the narrow interpretation of "derived from" as in the earlier Sterling Foods ruling. Income from lorry hire, weighment charges, miscellaneous receipts, fixed deposits and similar ancillary sources, as well as sale of import entitlements, does not qualify as profit derived from the industrial unit. Further, losses from other units cannot be set off against the profits of the eligible undertaking for computing the section 80HH deduction, as such set-off would yield an artificial figure. The reference was answered against the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of sections 80J and 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the entitlement to deductions for losses incurred in one industrial unit against profits of another unit.

Question 1:
The Tribunal's decision on the deduction under section 80J for a loss-making hydrogenation plant when the total income was positive was challenged. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim that the solvent plant's profits should not be offset by the hydrogenation plant's losses for section 80HH purposes.

Question 2:
The Tribunal's ruling on excluding income from lorry hire, weighment charges, and other activities from the computation of relief under section 80HH for the solvent plant was contested. The Appellate Tribunal allowed the benefit of section 80HH for the exclusive income of the solvent plant.

Question 3:
The dispute arose regarding the treatment of losses from the hydrogenation plant against the profits of the solvent plant for calculating the deduction under section 80HH. The Appellate Tribunal held that the deduction should be based on the net income of the solvent plant before setting off losses from the hydrogenation plant.

The judgment cited precedents to support the interpretation of sections 80J and 80HH. It emphasized that profits and gains for deductions should be directly derived from the industrial unit in question. Losses from one unit cannot be offset against profits of another unit for claiming deductions. The decision highlighted the importance of the term "derived from" in determining eligible income for deductions under the relevant sections.

In conclusion, the first two questions were answered in favor of the Revenue, while the third question was decided in favor of the assessee. The judgment provided clarity on the application of sections 80J and 80HH, emphasizing that deductions should be based on profits directly derived from the industrial undertaking without offsetting losses from other units.

---