Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activity of purchasing BSNL post-paid and pre-paid SIM cards and reselling them on a profit margin amounted to Business Auxiliary Service so as to attract service tax and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The appellants had purchased the SIM cards on outright basis, paid the full value to BSNL, and resold them in the market. The activity was found to be a transaction of purchase and sale for profit, not an agency or commission-based service of promoting or marketing another's services. The Tribunal also noted that BSNL had already discharged service tax on the SIM cards sold to the appellants, and the impugned levy would, in the circumstances, result in double taxation. On these facts, the finding that the appellants were rendering marketing or distribution services within Business Auxiliary Service was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The levy of service tax and the penalty were not justified and the assessee succeeded.