Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Taxable IVTC Services: Ruling on Fees vs. Royalty Classification

        XYZ

        XYZ - [2012] 348 ITR 31 (AAR) Issues Involved:
        1. Taxability of payments received/receivable for IVTC services as 'fees for technical services' (FTS) or 'royalty' under the DTAA.
        2. Applicability of Section 9(1)(vii)(b) exception of the Income-tax Act.
        3. Taxability of payments received/receivable for services provided.
        4. Taxability of payments received/receivable for costs incurred on behalf of X India.
        5. Taxability of recovery of administrative costs incurred for and on behalf of X India.
        6. Obligation of X India/Indian customers to withhold taxes under Section 195.
        7. Obligation of the applicants to file a tax return in India under Section 139.

        Detailed Analysis:

        Issue 1: Taxability of Payments for IVTC Services
        The applicants sought an advance ruling on whether payments for Inspection, Verification, Testing, and Certification (IVTC) services are taxable in India as FTS or 'royalty' under the DTAA. The ruling determined that these payments are taxable as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. However, under the DTAA, the term 'fees for technical services' means payments for rendering technical or consultancy services that make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes. The ruling concluded that the services provided did not 'make available' technical knowledge, thus not taxable under the DTAA.

        Issue 2: Applicability of Section 9(1)(vii)(b) Exception
        The ruling referenced a previous decision (AAR 928 of 2010) and concluded that the exception provided in Section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Act is not available to the applicants. This section generally exempts certain payments from being taxed as FTS if the services are utilized for business or profession outside India or for earning income from a source outside India.

        Issue 3: Taxability of Payments for Services Provided
        The ruling reiterated that payments received/receivable for IVTC services are taxable as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The services do not 'make available' technical knowledge or skill to X India/Indian customers, thus not taxable under the DTAA.

        Issue 4: Taxability of Payments for Costs Incurred on Behalf of X India
        The ruling held that payments received/receivable for costs incurred on behalf of X India are taxable as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. However, these payments are not taxable under the DTAA, given the absence of a 'make available' clause.

        Issue 5: Taxability of Recovery of Administrative Costs
        The recovery of reasonable administrative costs incurred for and on behalf of X India by the applicants is chargeable to tax as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. Similar to other payments, these are not taxable under the DTAA due to the 'make available' clause.

        Issue 6: Obligation to Withhold Taxes Under Section 195
        Since the applicants do not have a tax presence in India, X India/Indian customers are not required to withhold taxes under Section 195 of the Act. The ruling emphasized that the applicants' tax presence is crucial for determining the withholding tax obligations.

        Issue 7: Obligation to File a Tax Return in India
        The ruling stated that applicants are required to file tax returns in India under Section 139 of the Act, as they would have been taxable under Section 9(1)(vii) but for the intervention of the respective DTAA.

        Separate Judgments:
        - A.A.R. Nos. 886 to 892, 899 to 903 of 2010: Payments for IVTC services are taxable as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) but not under the DTAA.
        - A.A.R. Nos. 893 to 898, 904, 907 to 910, 921 of 2010: The 'make available' clause in the Protocols of the DTAA applies, and thus, the services are not taxable under the DTAA.
        - A.A.R. Nos. 913 to 920 of 2010: In the absence of a specific FTS provision in the DTAA, payments are taxable as business income under Article 7, but not as FTS.
        - A.A.R. Nos. 905, 906, 911, 922 to 924, 927, 929, and 930 of 2010: Payments for IVTC services are taxable as FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and under the DTAA.

        Conclusion:
        The ruling concluded that while the payments for IVTC services are taxable under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, they are not taxable under the DTAA due to the 'make available' clause. The applicants are required to file tax returns in India, and X India/Indian customers are not obligated to withhold taxes under Section 195.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found