Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Supreme Court affirms sale of scrap, not machinery, by Neyveli Lignite Corp. 4% sales tax rate upheld.</h1> The Supreme Court affirmed the Madras High Court's ruling that the sale by Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) to the respondent constituted a sale of ... VAT / Sales tax on sale of scrap - whether sales tax is leviable and payable on the articles at four per cent as the plant and machinery was sought to be sold as scrap or whether the respondent is liable to pay sales tax at 12 per cent with five per cent surcharge also - appellants has submitted that what was sold was plant and machinery and not scrap at the agreement stage as is indicated from the acceptance letter and that it is only subsequently and during the post-contract period only, the said plant and machinery was removed as scraps after dismantling them and dividing the articles into several lots and taking away the same by getting 100 gate passes and challans issued – Held that:- plant and machinery had outlived its utility and had no value except as scrap, respondent has paid sales tax and surcharge at the higher rate of 12 per cent and five per cent while taking the goods out of the factory premises, respondent becomes entitled for refund of overpaid amount, appeal is dismissed Issues Involved:1. Whether the sale of plant and machinery by Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) to the respondent was a sale of scrap or a sale of plant and machinery.2. The applicable rate of sales tax on the transaction.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Nature of Sale - Scrap vs. Plant and MachineryThe primary issue was whether the sale by Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) to the respondent was of scrap or plant and machinery. The NLC had sold its condemned plant and machinery through M/s. Metal Scrap and Trading Corporation Ltd. (MSTC) via e-auction. The appellants contended that the sale was of plant and machinery, not scrap, as indicated by the acceptance letter and subsequent dismantling and transport of the items. However, the court scrutinized the agreement between NLC and MSTC, which explicitly referred to the sale of 'iron and steel scrap and rejected/condemned/obsolete secondary arisings.' The court also noted that the acceptance letter mentioned the sale was on an 'as-is-where-is' basis and referred to the total value as scrap. Furthermore, the use of explosives for dismantling the machinery and the subsequent transport of the items as scrap reinforced the conclusion that the sale was indeed of scrap.Issue 2: Applicable Rate of Sales TaxThe second issue concerned the applicable rate of sales tax on the transaction. Initially, the sales tax authorities indicated that if the plant and machinery were sold as scrap, the applicable tax rate would be 4% without surcharge. However, they later changed their stance, asserting a tax rate of 12% with a 5% surcharge, treating the sale as one of plant and machinery. The respondent contested this, leading to the filing of writ petitions. The Madras High Court, both at the single judge and Division Bench levels, held that the sale was of scrap, thus attracting a tax rate of 4%. The Supreme Court affirmed this finding, emphasizing that the contemporaneous documents and factual position clearly indicated the sale of scrap. The court dismissed the appeal, finding no merit in the appellants' contention.Conclusion:The Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court's decision that the sale by NLC to the respondent was of scrap, not plant and machinery. Consequently, the applicable sales tax rate was 4%. The court dismissed the appeal, directing the refund of the overpaid amount to the respondent along with interest as per law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found