TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules in favor of assessee on cane purchase tax interest, but Revenue wins on bank overdraft diversion.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Saraya Sugar Mills Private Limited</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Saraya Sugar Mills Private Limited - [1993] 201 ITR 181, 110 CTR 23 Issues involved: The judgment involves three questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, for the assessment year 1972-73 under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Question No. 1: The assessee paid interest on late payment of cane purchase tax, which was disallowed. The court considered a similar case in a previous judgment and ruled in favor of the assessee. Therefore, the court answered question No. 1 in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.Question No. 2: The assessee-company diverted part of the bank overdraft to directors and firms in which the directors had substantial interest, without charging interest. The assessing authority disallowed the interest paid by the company to the bank for non-business purposes. A similar case was decided against the assessee in a previous assessment year. Following that decision, the court answered question No. 2 in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.Question No. 3: Since question No. 3 is interconnected with question No. 2, which was decided in favor of the Revenue, no separate answer was provided for question No. 3.The reference was answered accordingly with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 