Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (4) TMI 869 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeals Decisions: Remand for Reassessment, Quash Reopening under Section 147 The appeals in the case were decided as follows: In ITA No. 3533/Mum/2010, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeals Decisions: Remand for Reassessment, Quash Reopening under Section 147

                            The appeals in the case were decided as follows: In ITA No. 3533/Mum/2010, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the AO. In ITA No. 3534/Mum/2010, the appeal was allowed, and the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was quashed. In ITA No. 3535/Mum/2010, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the AO.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance of expenses under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Validity of reopening assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
                            3. Applicability of Section 14A to tax-free dividend and interest income.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance of Expenses under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act:
                            The primary issue in ITA No. 3533/Mum/2010 pertains to the disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 9,94,23,807/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed these expenses, and the CIT(A) directed the AO to compute the disallowance following the ITAT's decision in Daga Capital Investment Ltd., in accordance with Rule 8D read with Section 14A. The parties agreed that the issue is covered by the jurisdictional High Court in Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which held that Rule 8D is applicable from the assessment year 2008-09 onwards. For prior years, the AO must adopt a reasonable basis to determine the expenditure related to income not forming part of the total income. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the AO to decide afresh in light of the High Court's judgment, ensuring reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present relevant material.

                            2. Validity of Reopening Assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act:
                            In ITA No. 3534/Mum/2010, the issue revolves around the reopening of assessment under Section 147. The assessee argued that the reopening was based on a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible as per the Supreme Court's decision in Kelvinator of India Ltd. The assessee had disclosed all material facts regarding the write-off of non-convertible debentures as irrecoverable. The AO reopened the assessment on the grounds that the investment in non-convertible debentures did not constitute the ordinary course of business. The CIT(A) upheld the reopening, relying on the Tribunal's decision in CIBA India P. Ltd., which was not applicable as it dealt with reopening under Section 143(1), not 143(3). The ITAT found that there was no new material before the AO to justify the reopening and quashed the reassessment, following the Supreme Court and jurisdictional High Court precedents that mere change of opinion cannot justify reopening under Section 147.

                            3. Applicability of Section 14A to Tax-Free Dividend and Interest Income:
                            In ITA No. 3535/Mum/2010, the assessee contested the applicability of Section 14A to tax-free dividend and interest income. The AO had apportioned interest expenditure to all activities, including tax-free income, resulting in a disallowance of Rs. 2,92,15,306/-. The CIT(A) directed the AO to verify the disallowance based on Rule 8D, following the ITAT's decision in Daga Capital Investment Ltd. The parties agreed that the issue is covered by the jurisdictional High Court in Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which held that Rule 8D is applicable from the assessment year 2008-09 onwards. For prior years, the AO must determine the expenditure related to tax-free income on a reasonable basis. The matter was remanded back to the AO to decide afresh in light of the High Court's judgment, ensuring reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present relevant material.

                            Conclusion:
                            In conclusion, the appeals were decided as follows:
                            - ITA No. 3533/Mum/2010: The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the AO.
                            - ITA No. 3534/Mum/2010: The appeal was allowed, and the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was quashed.
                            - ITA No. 3535/Mum/2010: The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter back to the AO.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found