Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were bound to implement the Tribunal's order and release the imported goods, subject to the conditions imposed for repacking, relabeling, inspection and certification.
Analysis: The order of the Tribunal had set aside the confiscation order and permitted the goods to be repacked and relabeled in a customs bonded premises, with testing by the Port Health Authorities before customs clearance. The respondents were unable to show that the Tribunal's order had been challenged by way of appeal or stayed. The Court found that the Tribunal's directions contained sufficient safeguards to ensure compliance with local law and to verify that the goods were fit for human consumption before release.
Conclusion: The respondents were directed to implement the Tribunal's order and release the goods within two weeks, subject to the conditions already prescribed and any further lawful conditions, and only after the goods were found fit for human consumption.