TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules payments from Mandi Samitis to State Board exempt under Income Tax Act.</h1> The High Court held that amounts paid by Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samitis to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board qualify for exemption under the ... Amounts paid by the Samitees to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board under statutory obligation - whether it is application of its receipts entitling exemption under section/allowance from the income - Held that:- Mandi Act envisages market areas in the State and the Samitis to govern it. The Samities are a body established and incorporated under section 12 of the Mandi Act - The amount of Mandi Shulk as well as Development Cess sent by the different Mandi Samitis to the State Agricultural Produce Market Board is a utilisation of all the receipts. The amount of Mandi Shulk as well as Development Cess sent by the different Mandi Samitis to the State Agricultural Produce Market Board is a utilisation of all the receipts and the Tribunal as well as Commissioner (Appeals) have rightly deleted the addition. Issues:- Whether amounts paid by Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samitis to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board under statutory obligation qualify for exemption under the Income Tax Act.Analysis:1. Facts and Background:- The appeals pertain to Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2005-07 under the Income Tax Act involving different Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samitis incorporated under the UP Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Adhiniyam, 1964.- The main issue is whether the amounts paid by the Samitis to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board are eligible for exemption under the IT Act.2. Assessing Officer's Disallowance:- The Assessing Officer disallowed the amounts paid by the Samitis to the Board, stating it was not proper utilization and thus not eligible for exemption.3. Appeals and Tribunal Orders:- The Samitis appealed, and the Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in their favor, allowing the exemption for the amounts sent to the Board.- The Income Tax Department then filed appeals before the Tribunal, which were dismissed, leading to the present appeals before the High Court.4. Court's Decision and Reasoning:- The Court highlighted the purpose of the Mandi Act to ensure fair prices for agricultural produce by regulating agricultural markets through Samitis and the Board.- It was noted that the Samitis are established under the Mandi Act, which also mandates sending a portion of collected amounts to the Board for market development.- The Court referred to a previous decision where it was held that the Samitis are entitled to registration under the IT Act.- Emphasizing that the amounts sent to the Board are utilized for market development and management, the Court concluded that the Samitis are entitled to claim exemption/allowances for the same.- The Court also cited a similar ruling by the Rajasthan High Court in a comparable case, supporting its decision.5. Conclusions and Dismissal of Appeals:- The High Court concluded that the amounts sent by the Samitis to the Board constitute proper utilization of collected funds, entitling them to exemption.- It upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) in deleting the additions, stating that there was no merit in the appeals.- Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals in light of its conclusions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
