Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether JCB earth movers were entitled to depreciation at 30% as motor lorries or were correctly restricted to 15% as plant and machinery.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the registration records and found that the vehicles were registered as hydraulic excavators and earth moving machinery, not as heavy motor vehicles. It held that the principal function of a JCB is excavation of soil and earth, not carriage of goods on roads like motor lorries or motor trucks. The Tribunal distinguished the authorities relied upon by the assessee, noting that the higher depreciation cases involved vehicles registered as heavy motor vehicles or turned on different statutory contexts. It further held that the wider definition of motor vehicle under transport law could not control the specific depreciation scheme under the Income-tax Act, where JCB machines fall within the residual category of machinery and plant.
Conclusion: The claim for depreciation at 30% was rejected and depreciation at 15% was upheld.