Tribunal remands traveling expenses issue to Assessing Officer for reassessment, allows loss carry forward.

The Tribunal remanded the issue of the provision for traveling expenses back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment, allowing the assessee to produce vouchers. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the carry forward of losses amounting to Rs. 66,61,499/- from the assessment year 2001-02, disagreeing with the disallowance based on the unit's eligibility for deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Rs. 1,09,42,121/- on account of provision for traveling expenses.
2. Disallowance of carry forward losses amounting to Rs. 66,61,499/- pertaining to assessment year 2001-02.

Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs. 1,09,42,121/- on account of provision for traveling expenses

The assessee appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 1,09,42,121/- for traveling expenses by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to lack of relevant details. The AO found the expenses genuine except for the traveling provisions for Delhi and Mumbai units, which lacked a reasonable basis. The AO added Rs. 1,09,42,121/- to the income.

Before the CIT(A), the appellant argued that the provision was based on invoices and expense reimbursement forms. The AO's remand report noted that actual expenses were Rs. 72,15,722/-, less than the provision claimed, justifying the disallowance. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision due to the assessee's failure to produce vouchers.

The Tribunal considered the principles from Bharat Earth Movers v CIT and Metal Box Company of India Ltd., stating that liabilities accrued due should be deducted while computing profits. The Tribunal noted that the provision for expenses should be based on a fair estimate and not entirely disallowed if vouchers were not produced. Citing precedents, the Tribunal decided that disallowing the entire provision was unjustified and remanded the matter back to the AO for reconsideration, allowing the assessee to produce vouchers.

Issue 2: Disallowance of carry forward losses amounting to Rs. 66,61,499/- pertaining to assessment year 2001-02

The AO disallowed the carry forward losses of Rs. 66,61,499/- from the assessment year 2001-02, arguing that the losses related to a unit entitled to deduction under section 10B of the I.T. Act, which does not permit carry forward and set off of such losses.

The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that units claiming deduction under section 10B cannot carry forward losses to be adjusted against business income. The appellant argued that the loss was assessed for the year 2001-02, and hence, it should be set off against subsequent year's income.

The Tribunal examined the case, noting that the assessee withdrew the claim of exemption under section 10B for the year 2001-02 in a revised return. Therefore, the loss for 2001-02 was not for a unit eligible for section 10B exemption. The Tribunal referred to various judgments supporting the set-off of losses against other income and noted that the declaration under section 10B(8) was satisfied for both years 2001-02 and 2002-03.

The Tribunal distinguished between the provisions applicable before and after the amendment by the Finance Act, 2000, which changed the treatment of section 10B from exemption to deduction. The Tribunal concluded that for assessment years post-2001-02, the loss of a unit not claiming section 10B deduction should be set off against the total income. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was not justified in disallowing the carry forward loss of 2001-02 and allowed the appeal.

Conclusion:

The appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal remanding the issue of provision for traveling expenses back to the AO for reassessment and permitting the carry forward of losses from the assessment year 2001-02.

---