Belated exemption claim cannot defeat a beneficial notification when substantive eligibility is otherwise undisputed.

An otherwise applicable exemption notification cannot be denied merely because the assessee raised the claim at a later stage. The Revenue objected only that Notification No. 76/86-C.E. was not claimed during investigation or earlier, but did not dispute its substantive availability. The Tribunal treated the exemption as beneficial in nature and held that belated assertion alone does not defeat entitlement. It also noted that the Revenue had not specifically challenged the setting aside of penalties on the other respondents. The Commissioner (Appeals)' order granting the exemption and cancelling the demand and penalties was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the benefit of an exemption notification can be claimed at a later stage and denied merely because it was not claimed at the initial stage.

Analysis: The only objection raised by the Revenue was that the exemption under Notification No. 76/86-C.E. was not claimed during investigation or before. The Revenue did not dispute the availability of the notification on merits. A beneficial exemption, if otherwise applicable, cannot be denied solely because the claim was made belatedly. The Tribunal also noted that the Revenue had not specifically challenged the setting aside of penalties on the other respondents.

Conclusion: The belated claim did not defeat entitlement to the exemption. The Revenue's appeals failed.

Final Conclusion: The common order of the Commissioner (Appeals) granting the exemption and setting aside the demand and penalties was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: An assessee cannot be denied the benefit of an otherwise applicable exemption notification merely because the claim was raised at a subsequent stage.

---